Tag Archive: “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1”


http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/review-deathly-hallows-part-2-is-a-perfect-end-to-the-potter-series/

Everything ends. 10 years of build. 10 years for millions and millions of fans around the world to wonder just how the Harry Potter franchise would end. While many of those fans learned exactly how it ended when Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows the book released in 2007, seeing the conclusion come to cinematic life is finally upon us. No one, not J.K. Rowling, not the cast, not the director David Yates, have let us down, and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, the conclusion to the conclusion, ends up being the most satisfying conclusion that could possibly have been made. Not only that, it comes off as the best Harry Potter film to date and even rivals such notable series enders as Return of the King and Return of the Jedi. With time, it could even find its way to surpassing them both.

The synopsis is about as simple as the Harry Potter films get. With only half a book to deal with in this last film, it all boils down to the third act, the last few chapters, the point where everything comes to a head and the ultimate battle rages on. The setting this time around isn’t a tedious forest, something those who weren’t too fond of Deathly Hallows: Part 1 will be thankful for. Instead, the setting for the final battle is Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. The combatants are the forces of good versus the forces of evil, but that goes without saying, too. And at the heart is Harry Potter, played for the last time by Daniel Radcliffe, versus the evil Voldemort, played by Ralph Fiennes.

The series has had ups and downs, bumps in the long and winding road from Harry learning his wizardry powers to finally coming face to face with his archenemy. For the past four or five films, at least since Yates took over directing duties on Order of the Phoenix, the series has spun its wheels a bit, biding its time and building to this seventh story. Plot progressed. Characters grew. Some even died, but knowing you were right in the middle of an overlaying story whose conclusion wouldn’t be seen for two or three more films was always a hindrance to be taken into account. With Deathly Hallows: Part 2, the stakes are at their highest, and every emotion, every painful loss of a notable character is felt. It’s now when everything matters, and the stories and arcs that have come before are allowed to meet their respective finales.

It’s in the battle between Harry and Voldemort. You know at least one of them isn’t going to make it to the end, and everything that has come into play between the two characters, even though they haven’t shared much screen time, comes into play. It’s in the relationships between Harry, Hermione (Emma Watson), and Ron (Rupert Grint). The child actors have grown into adults as have their characters, and the journey we’ve taken with them for the past seven films and ten years pays off as well as it possibly can. When choices are made between any two of them, it sends shockwaves through your memory, forces you to remember the children they were and gaze at the young adults and fine actors they have all become.

The emotional journey is felt in secondary characters, too. Every character, at least every named character, has their moment to shine in Deathly Hallows: Part 2. Yates and screenwriter Steve Kloves allow for this in the film’s run time and pacing so that no character and no event ever fekt short-changed. Deathly Hallows: Part 2 could actually be seen as a study in time management in film. Nothing is rushed. Nothing feels left out. Every character is given their just due. And it’s all in their in a film that runs just over two hours. It really is a wonder to behold all they are able to pack in to a film with a run time of less than three hours.

And then there’s Alan Rickman as Snape, the enigmatic yet oftentimes closefisted teacher who has since become schoolmaster at Hogwarts. In Deathly Hallows: Part 2, every action from this character, every question you may have had about him, is answered, and it’s gloriously and heartbreakingly constructed. And behind it all is Rickman, pillar of serious and genuine performance that he is. In the short time he’s given in this last film, you realize no one could have played this character quite like Rickman, and among the innumerable ways in which this last story makes you want to go back and revisit past ones, his performance throughout this arc is at the top of the list.

But Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is more than just overwhelming emotion. The action staged is impeccably constructed, as well. There’s been a question about Yates’ ability to truly craft decent action, but within the two films that make up Deathly Hallows, the questioning can stop. Much of the film revolves around or has as a backdrop one, large battle around Hogwarts. While we don’t see much of the battle first-hand, we see enough. Much of the true emotion that comes from it, the lost lives being the main source of said emotion, comes in the aftermath when Harry and his friends are seeing the damage Voldemort and his minions are creating. It could be a way of not having to shoot much action, a way for Yates to work around what he himself sees as a weakness in his direction. However, it works better this way. The emotional impact is stronger when the results of this battle are revealed after the fact rather than seeing them first-hand.

Which brings us to the 3-D element, not an element often brought up in reviews, as they don’t generally qualify for every viewer of the film. Unfortunately, when the case is such that the 3-D distracts, when it is so bad that it takes you out of the film, it almost has to be brought up as a warning. Such is the case with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, a post-converted splotch on an otherwise masterful work of cinema. Audiences are given a choice, not always the case, and they should be told that, as has been seen before, the 3-D in Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is not only not good, it’s a diversion.

Yet when that seems to be the only truly bad element of a film, it can hardly be taken into account against the film itself. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is a flawless consummation to 10 years of steady build. At any moment, the series could have lagged to the point of dropping out completely. It could have given up anywhere in any of the previous seven films, but despite finding a few dips, it never sank. It’s gotten us here, and thank Dumbledore for that, because with a capper as masterfully put together as Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is, it makes revisiting the entire journey all the more worthwhile.

Jeremy’s Rating: 9.5 out of 10

July 15, 2011
by Jeremy Kirk

 

 

Advertisements

I just return home from seeing Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part two. I must say it was the best out of all the movies. The audince clapped when Molly Weasley killed Bellatrix Lestrange, cheer when Nagini, and did the same at the end of the movie. It was really cool the way Voldemort’s death scene was.(you’re going to have to see the movie to find out). It was also very sad because some of m favorite charaters died in this movie, but other than that it was a very good movie and I hope ya’ll see it. bye

In this film publicity image released by Warner Bros. Pictures, from left, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe are shown in a scene from "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2." (AP Photo/Warner Bros. Pictures, Jaap Buitendijk)In this film publicity image released by Warner Bros. Pictures, from left, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint are shown in a scene from "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2." (AP Photo/Warner Bros. Pictures)

http://news.yahoo.com/review-final-potter-film-sad-satisfying-142442441.html

If last year’s “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1” marked the beginning of the end with a gripping feeling of doom and gloom, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2” wraps things up once and for all on a note of melancholy.

Oh, it’s dramatic, to be sure: gorgeous, somber and startling as the young wizard faces his destiny and fights the evil Lord Voldemort. But the end of this staggeringly successful movie franchise, an epic fantasy saga spanning eight films over the past decade, provides a necessary emotional catharsis for Harry and for us. Even those who aren’t ardent Potterphiles — who aren’t waiting in a line around the theater with their homemade wands and hand-drawn lightning scars — might find themselves getting unexpectedly choked up a couple of times.

That’s always been the real magic of the series, based on J.K. Rowling’s novels: that mixture of the exotic and the everyday, the otherworldly and the utterly relatable. No longer the innocent children they were when they entered Hogwarts, Harry, Ron and Hermione are growing up and moving on, and so must we. That the future of the wizard world hangs in the balance in this final installment is only part of the tale.

Still, director David Yates has accomplished the difficult task of bringing it all to a close in satisfying fashion. Having directed the last four of the eight films, Yates has provided a momentum and cohesion to the “Harry Potter” canon, which has gotten progressively darker and more mature. And Steve Kloves, who’s written all but one of the screenplays in the series, has once again risen to the challenge of trying to please purists and casual viewers alike in adapting Rowling’s revered writing.

It’s hard to imagine how complicated this must have been, given the density of the mythology, even though the final book was divided into two films. (Although the epilogue, which features some of the main characters decked out in grown-up makeup, does seem a bit cheesy and hasty and it might inspire a few giggles.)

At the same time, because it took two films to depict the action in the last installment, this second half doesn’t feel overstuffed or overlong. It moves with great urgency toward the final showdown between Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) and Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes, deeply disturbing as usual); danger infuses every moment, and it never overstays its welcome.

Much of that has to do with the look of the film, both in its attention to inventive detail and to the sweeping, elaborate set pieces. The cinematography from Eduardo Serra, who also shot “Deathly Hallows: Part 1,” is once again richly ominous and beautifully bleak. Here, Hogwarts isn’t a warm, bustling place full of possibilities but rather a fearsome fortress swarming with Death Eaters, where Professor Severus Snape (the deliciously icy Alan Rickman) rules as if leading his own fascist regime.

Yes, “Deathly Hallows: Part 2” is in 3-D — it’s the only installment in the series to be presented that way — and as usual, that was unnecessary. The technical elements all looked flawless and immersive in the previous film. (Warner Bros. wisely chose not to rush the conversion from 2-D on “Deathly Hallows: Part 1,” and instead took more time for the process here.) But the addition of a third dimension does allow some details to pop, and it’s never a distraction.

Although the “Potter” films have always been about the escape of the spectacle, the kids and their struggle to navigate both good and evil provides some much-needed rooting in reality. Radcliffe has never been better, and brief flashbacks to the earliest images of him in the role only serve as a reminder of how far he’s come. The character has long since been cemented into his identity, but more is required of him physically and emotionally than ever before, and he’s more than up for it all.

“Deathly Hallows: Part 2” drops us into a menacing version of this world we’ve come to know, immediately and without explanation; it’s a bit disorienting at first, even if you’ve seen all that’s come before it. Then again, if you’re bothering to check out the finale, in theory you should know what’s going on.

Harry, Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) are still hunting Horcruxes — scattered containers that hold pieces of Voldemort’s soul, which are crucial to Harry’s survival — in order to destroy them. One of them is being stored in Bellatrix Lestrange’s bank vault, which allows Helena Bonham Carter to have a bit of fun with her wicked character. Hogwarts is no longer a place of refuge as Voldemort draws ever closer; his attack on the stately school is thrilling, but it also provides moments of heroism for some characters you might not expect.

Still, this is the place where all the narrative and emotional threads must converge and tie up at last. While “Deathly Hallows: Part 2″ offers long-promised answers, it also dares to pose some eternal questions, and it’ll stay with you after the final chapter has closed.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release, is rated PG-13 for some sequence of intense action violence and frightening images. Running time: 130 minutes. Three and a half stars out of four.

___

Motion Picture Association of America rating definitions:

G — General audiences. All ages admitted.

PG — Parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.

PG-13 — Special parental guidance strongly suggested for children under 13. Some material may be inappropriate for young children.

R — Restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

NC-17 — No one under 17 admitted.

<img src=”http://geo.yahoo.com/p?s=46077659&pt=storypage&t=1839966123&sec=MediaInfiniteBrowse&ret=137aac35-1148-3b47-b840-569d33782593%3Aa0993c62-9e7d-3801-a42e-d3954ccbd38b%3A734f8f63-5ce6-365d-ba58-f57f3e77aae7%3Aca7ad63b-e70c-53c0-a079-6f2a89e5e1bb&pstaid=137aac35-1148-3b47-b840-569d33782593&csrcpvid=kZX3o2KLPnFGMPaYThpbPgMUQzxw004bcigACqpH&#8221; style=”position:absolute;” />

  • Swolfe
    17users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down1users disliked this comment

    Swolfe5 hours agoReport Abuse

    Awesome so glad to hear it does what it is supposed to do.  As long as Bellatrix gets it from Mrs. Weasley and they do the epilogue I will be fine:)  I will be crying I know I have read each book aout 5 times now…and we have the moviemarathon going this week…

    1 Reply

  • Eevie
    38users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down1users disliked this comment

    Eevie7 hours agoReport Abuse

    Loved the books, loved the movies. Can’t wait to see the final but will be sad when it’s all over.

    Reply

  • Patricia
    44users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down4users disliked this comment

    Patricia6 hours agoReport Abuse

    For those who don’t like Harry Potter – consider this.  What book or series of books have brought kids ( and adults) back to reading – really reading, not 140 character tweets?  My grandson ( now almost 21) started reading them, and he is a complete gamer. I started reading them to discuss the… More

    5 Replies

  • MICHELLE R
    14users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    MICHELLE R5 hours agoReport Abuse

    I am so sad to see the end of an absolutely amazing series.  My grandson and I have seen every single movie on opening night.  He has grown up with Harry Potter and I have grown old with him. I know it has to end but I don’t have to like it.  It was a great 10 years!

    Reply

  • 32users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down2users disliked this comment

    7 hours agoReport Abuse

    HARRY POTTER`s amazing!!!! Can`t wait for the last one..:)

    Reply

  • MichelleS
    31users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down2users disliked this comment

    MichelleS6 hours agoReport Abuse

    My son has grown up with Harry and we have seen all the movies together.  As Harry aged, my son was the same age in the books.  My son (now 20) and I will be at the theater on Thursday at midnight to see the final movie. I’m a little sad to see it end.

    Reply

  • sickofitall
    13users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    sickofitall3 hours agoReport Abuse

    Alan Rickman is wonderful…..no actor on the planet can snarl, drip scarcasm, and generally display contempt, disgust and sometimes, pure evil, than can he…he is the quintessential Snape…Richard Harris was the best Dumbledore and Maggie Smith was just the best…the casting in these films was… More

    Reply

  • kokopelli
    22users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down2users disliked this comment

    kokopelli6 hours agoReport Abuse

    I’m in my 50s and loved the Harry Potter books.  There’s so much depth to them – much more than can come across in the movies.  There’s the good vs evil theme throughout the series, but there’s also the topics of  racism (wizards vs muggles, looking down on mudbloods, Hermione fighting for the… More

    4 Replies

  • jnausicaa
    16users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down1users disliked this comment

    jnausicaa5 hours agoReport Abuse

    I can’t wait for Molly to take down Bellatrix.  I would gladly pay just to see that.  But 3-D?  Those glasses give me headaches.

    1 Reply

  • Megan T
    15users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down1users disliked this comment

    Megan T5 hours agoReport Abuse

    i can’t wait for this last installment!!!! i’m gonna be sad when it’s all over since i grew up with the series (i’m 20 now) but at least i’ll still be able to reread the books and watch the movies as many times as i want. i hope future generations will see what an amazing achievement this series is… More

    Reply

  • Steven
    17users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down3users disliked this comment

    Steven6 hours agoReport Abuse

    I guess I should start watching Harry Potter, see what all the fuss is about…

    4 Replies

  • CMB
    13users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down2users disliked this comment

    CMB6 hours agoReport Abuse

    such a thing of beauty 🙂 i cannot wait until fridayy !

    2 Replies

  • 11users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down2users disliked this comment

    6 hours agoReport Abuse

    I am really excited to see the final film but I am also dreading it.  It was the last book after all and I found it to be the hardest to to read so I know it will be the hardest to watch.

    3 Replies

  • 7users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    5 hours agoReport Abuse

    i love harry potter i will miss it

    Reply

  • Jean Blum
    7users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    Jean Blum5 hours agoReport Abuse

    My children and I have been hooked on Harry Potter since the very first book.  I can’t imagine this being the end.  Kudos to all involved in bringing these books to life!! Wonderful job!!

    Reply

  • Alex Alvarenga
    6users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    Alex Alvarenga3 hours agoReport Abuse

    Saw the first with my then young son and then wife now looking forward to seeing the last one with my now grown son

    Reply

  • Sac2OK57
    4users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    Sac2OK575 hours agoReport Abuse

    Like any good adventure and incredibly special friends, Harry, Hermione, Ron, Ginny and the gang will never truly gone.  They will live on in our imagination, continuing the fight against the forces of darkness, training their children and the next generation to do the same.  So, as this is not… More

    1 Reply

  • Gary G
    14users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down2users disliked this comment

    Gary G6 hours agoReport Abuse

    Well done movies and books.
    For those who enjoy reading and watching the Potter saga it’s been a long journey.

    Reply

  • Jessie
    5users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    Jessie3 hours agoReport Abuse

    I’ve seen every movie and read every book. I’ve grown up with the series. The only series I would not give up on. I’m not even old enough to remember when the first movie came out and, yet, I know every book by heart. This last installment promisies to be everything and more. It’ll be so sad when… More

    Reply

  • Nupur
    5users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    Nupur4 hours agoReport Abuse

    Haven’t seen the movie yet, but this is such a well-written review!

    Reply


//
// ]]>

 

 

%d bloggers like this: